Helpdesk

Top image

Editorial board

Darius Andriukaitis
Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania

Alexander Argyros
The University of Sydney, Australia

Radu Arsinte
Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Romania

Ivan Baronak
Slovak University of Technology, Slovakia

Khosrow Behbehani
The University of Texas at Arlington, United States

Mohamed El Hachemi Benbouzid
University of Brest, France

Dalibor Biolek
University of Defence, Czech Republic

Klara Capova
University of Zilina, Slovakia

Erik Chromy
UPC Broadband Slovakia, Slovakia

Milan Dado
University of Zilina, Slovakia

Petr Drexler
Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic

Eva Gescheidtova
Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic

Ray-Guang Cheng
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Province of China

Gokhan Hakki Ilk
Ankara University, Turkey

Janusz Jezewski
Institute of Medical Technology and Equipment, Poland

Rene Kalus
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic

Ivan Kasik
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic

Jan Kohout
University of Defence, Czech Republic

Ondrej Krejcar
University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

Miroslaw Luft
Technical University of Radom, Poland

Stanislav Marchevsky
Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia

Byung-Seo Kim
Hongik University, Korea

Valeriy Arkhin
Buryat State University, Russia

Rupak Kharel
University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

Fayaz Hussain
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Peppino Fazio
Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy

Fazel Mohammadi
University of New Haven, United States of America

Thang Trung Nguyen
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Le Anh Vu
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Miroslav Voznak
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic

Zbigniew Leonowicz
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland

Wasiu Oyewole Popoola
The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Yuriy S. Shmaliy
Guanajuato University, Mexico

Lorand Szabo
Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Romania

Tran Trung Duy
Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Xingwang Li
Henan Polytechnic University, China

Huynh Van Van
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Lubos Rejfek
University of Pardubice, Czech Republic

Neeta Pandey
Delhi Technological University, India

Huynh The Thien
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Vietnam

Mauro Tropea
DIMES Department of University of Calabria, Italy

Gaojian Huang
Henan Polytechnic University, China

Nguyen Quang Sang
Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Vietnam

Anh-Tu Le
Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Vietnam

Phu Tran Tin
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam


Home Search Mail RSS


Public Protection from Electromagnetic Fields of Industry Frequency

Kazimieras Vytautas Maceika

DOI:


Abstract

Lithuania introduced normative of public protection from 50 Hz frequency electric field. It proposed permissible intensity of this field – 0,5 kV/m inside buildings and 1 kV/m in their territory. Separate normative is prepared for industry frequency electric and magnetic fields in work places. Permitted values of fields depend on exposure duration, but cannot exceed 25 kV/m and 5,1 kA/m. Russian, Swedish and American scientists declare that long time exposure of 50 Hz magnetic field with intensity more than 0,2-0,3 µT is dangerous for carcinogenic risk. International Agency for research on Cancer (IARC) initiated a program to evaluate the carcinogenic risk of low frequency electromagnetic fields to humans and till 2002 year collected a lot of information for different countries with quantitative analysis of epidemic data. Standardized incidents ratio (SIR) was proposed for evaluation of leukaemia in humans and especially children. Exposure of children in magneticfields > 0,4 µT showed a twofold SIR increasing. Data concerning the subject of an evaluation did not disclose inadequate evidence in humans and experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of magnetic fields of industry frequency, but they are classified as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”.

Keywords


Electromagnetic fields; carcinogenicity; standardized incidents ratio.

Full Text:

PDF