Comparison between Different Control Strategies of a Z-Source Inverter Based Dynamic Voltage Restorer

doi:10.15598/aeee.v11i3.782

Editorial board

Darius Andriukaitis
Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania

Alexander Argyros
The University of Sydney, Australia

Radu Arsinte
Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Romania

Ivan Baronak
Slovak University of Technology, Slovakia

Khosrow Behbehani
The University of Texas at Arlington, United States

Mohamed El Hachemi Benbouzid
University of Brest, France

Dalibor Biolek
University of Defence, Czech Republic

Klara Capova
University of Zilina, Slovakia

Erik Chromy
UPC Broadband Slovakia, Slovakia

Milan Dado
University of Zilina, Slovakia

Petr Drexler
Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic

Eva Gescheidtova
Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic

Ray-Guang Cheng
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Province of China

Gokhan Hakki Ilk
Ankara University, Turkey

Janusz Jezewski
Institute of Medical Technology and Equipment, Poland

Rene Kalus
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic

Ivan Kasik
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic

Jan Kohout
University of Defence, Czech Republic

Ondrej Krejcar
University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

Miroslaw Luft
Technical University of Radom, Poland

Stanislav Marchevsky
Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia

Byung-Seo Kim
Hongik University, Korea

Valeriy Arkhin
Buryat State University, Russia

Rupak Kharel
University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

Fayaz Hussain
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Peppino Fazio
Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy

Fazel Mohammadi
University of New Haven, United States of America

Thang Trung Nguyen
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Le Anh Vu
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Miroslav Voznak
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic

Zbigniew Leonowicz
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland

Wasiu Oyewole Popoola
The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Yuriy S. Shmaliy
Guanajuato University, Mexico

Lorand Szabo
Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Romania

Tran Trung Duy
Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Xingwang Li
Henan Polytechnic University, China

Huynh Van Van
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Lubos Rejfek
University of Pardubice, Czech Republic

Neeta Pandey
Delhi Technological University, India

Huynh The Thien
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Vietnam

Mauro Tropea
DIMES Department of University of Calabria, Italy

Gaojian Huang
Henan Polytechnic University, China

Nguyen Quang Sang
Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Vietnam

Anh-Tu Le
Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Vietnam

Phu Tran Tin
Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

Home > Open Journal Systems

- - -

Comparison between Different Control Strategies of a Z-Source Inverter Based Dynamic Voltage Restorer

Abolfazl Kazemdehdashti, Ali Reza Seifi, Amin Shabanpoor Haghighi

DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v11i3.782

Abstract

In this paper, dynamic voltage restorer (DVR) compensation methods are compared to each other for the load side connected shunt converter topology of z-source inverter based DVR to choose the best method. Four different topologies are recognized for DVR that two of them have energy storage devices, and two topologies have no energy storage that take ener\-gy from the grid during the period of compensation. Here the load side connected shunt converter topology that takes necessary energy from the grid is used. Pre-sag compensation, in-phase compensation, energy-optimized methods are the three DVR compensation methods that studied and compared. A deep analysis through different diagrams would show the advantages or disadvantages of each compensation method. Equations for all methods are derived and the characteristics of algorithms are compared with each other. The simulation results done by SIMULINK/ MATLAB shows compensating by this topology based on the compensation methods.